this game was fun. First of all, in our team, everyone takes only one fish so at the end the fishes were overcrowded in the lake. No one tries to take as many as possible because they know that if they do that the fishes will get less, and they're trying to do is to let the fish to grow as many as possible and then try to catch them in the end of the round. in society, people don't reward those with the most because they are killing the fishes and causing the ecosystem to be damaged. No one tries to take too many fish. People aren't reward fir doing so. In the second game we still made the fishes grow and then catch them but the only difference is that we started to catch them in the last three rounds. it's not possible because both of the number aren't suppose to be compared. Yes, in cafeteria, people try to cut lines and get many food to benefit themselves but the result is that other people won't have any food for them to eat. However, when the food is really bad, food becomes overproduced and later becomes a waste. Natural resources such as fish, crab, lobster, and other. People can use
Andy Liu's AP Microeconomics Blog
Sunday, December 23, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Journal Entry #16: Topic: Game Theory and Chicken
The prisoner’s dilemma is
a canonical example of a game analyzed in game theory that shows why two
individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best
interests to do so. In the game
theory, Adamn Smith wants people to act a way that everyone gets benefits but
it’s erally hard because everyone wants to act in a way where they can pursue
their self interest. Game theory can prevent people from doing the wrong
decision as a whole but it’s not possible to be exert into real life situation.
Bad outcome is unavoidable of course because people like to like in their self
interest, and when someone act in their self interest they cause other to act
like them or cause other to act in another way which they won’t get benefit as
a group. Bad outcome can be avoidable when people cooperate together. A better
outcome occur is when two people doesn’t act in a similar way such as one
confess and one doesn’t then both of them will get one year sentence. However
it’s impossible because people act in their self interest, and that means that
they want to get the least sentences they could and don’t care about what
another person gets. It’s really hard to get a good outcome if they don’t
cooperate.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Journal Entry #15: Topic: What is a Monopoly?
The monopoly is a market with a single firm that produces
a good or service for which no close substitute exists and that is protected by
a barrier that prevents other firms from selling that good or service. In a
monopoly, the supplier decides the produce and what price to change from the
supply and demand curve which it’s trying to make the marginal cost and
marginal revenue the same, maximizing economic profit. The cost for the
monopoly is that the monopolist needs to figure out how to produce or control
the market price, and the benefit is that the monopolist can control market
price by maintaining their business or company because they’re no close
substitute. They are concerned about inefficiency because inefficiency might
have inefficiency on resources that a lot of waste is produced. High markup,
for example the diamonds, are one of those monopoly that doesn’t give enough
money to the Africans who get their diamonds for the supplier. Economist
doesn’t like monopoly is that it transfers income away from consumers to
monopolists. Economist doesn’t like inefficiency because on one can entry the business
because a single seller or the first seller will benefit the most comparing to
the new adding business in monopoly. Their benefits, monopoly, are innovation
and creation that a firm gets a patent. It’s is worth it because if you contain
a monopoly continuously then you’re stil the price controller and therefore you
can still get your benefits.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Journal Topic 14 - Productivity Experiment
In the beginning, with only one
worker, the production was really slow. Then, when there’s a second worker, the
production gradually becomes faster. After 4 and 5 workers come in to join the
company, the company still has a increasing and accumulating production.
However, until the sixth worker, law of diminish returns appear because one the
one more member join. That one member is useless to the company because the
company has already fulfilled the requirements to produce to the maximum in the
fifth worker. Division of labor isn’t really efficient also because Jimmy
Chuang doesn’t assign the work really well, and he didn’t recognize people’s
specializations. However, after some gaining experiences from Jimmy, he assign people
who are better at cutting folding or stamping, which is giving people their
specializations. Things weren’t expected people our company’s workers started
the job when the company hasn’t open yet, so it’s inaccurate. No surprise at
all. In a short run people should adjust one of the variable cost such as how
many workers should work in their company, because if there’s too many workers
in a company, the company might faces the law of diminish returns. In a long
run, they should worry about all their variable cost including all of the
factor of production such as how many labor to get, how many capital should
they use to maximize their total revenue, and how to use their entrepreneurship.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Journal Topic 13: The Return of the Zeppelin
The things
that determines whether to demand of the return of the Zeppelin can be contradictory
because from the Hindenburg accident, a lot of people die, and it might make a
negative view of an airship, therefore, people won’t going to demand it.
Another perspective is people might demand a lot of Zeppelins and Airships
because people often like to take risk and other people also will like to look around
the world by a airship since a lot of people might be waiting for their coming
ups since 70 years ago, like the guy in the video. Technologies have changed a lot of the
functioning of the airship, so therefore, people feel safer to use a airship
since it’s more well made than before. Just like airplane, people died a lot
before from airplane accidents, but it’s lessen everything when technology
improves. I think it’s a monopolistic because only a few competitors compete
with each and another. It’s really close to a monopoly because the video says that
only 3 airships are in the world now. First of all, is the quality of the
airship, and then the improvement of the safety and technology, and the cost of
the airship might be three important factors for demanding an airship. If an airship
improves its technology or safety, people will demand more and successfully. Quality
is another important factor or determinant for demanding an airship because
people often decide to buy or not by its quality. It’s a great idea that people
can travel and enjoy seeing the whole view of the world by airships. Under the
circumstances of the most important, safety and high technology because it’s
the most important thing to be safe and settled down when doing any kinds of
thing.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Journal Topic 11: Brand Names and Utility
Obviously, we will buy or demand the goods
or services that are cheaper and more in our self-interest. In Wal-Mart and
Costco and other big company stories sells goods that have brands. Goods that
have brand names are more expensive than no brand names goods. The quantity
demand for the non brand goods increase and the quantity demand brand that has
name are lower than it. I think it’s more utility because a brane name are more
quality and durable, and so on, but as a consumer, I’ll choose goods that have cheaper
values if they are the same goods and products. In Aldi, every goods comparing
to other companies, their goods are 50 percent less. People started to consume
goods in Aldi because other companies sell the same thing as Aldi, but Aldi
only change the brands into non brand names. If I’m saving money, planning to retire
earlier, or other plans, I’ll go to Aldi because they sell cheaper products
that are same as the other companies. Oreo is a product that I think it needs
brands because I ate a lot of non brand oreo or fake oreo that taste really
bad. I basically accept any non brand stuff if they have low prices than the
others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)